The UK branch of StopItNow has launched to help people stop looking at CP. At its heart is a set of web-based modules that can be accessed anonymously. This is an exciting and promising new initiative — subject to one huge caveatThere are excellent reasons to stop looking at CP. Legal risk is high on the list. Interfering with one's personal values and life priorities is another. There are others.

A web interface seems great for a couple reasons. One is that it avoids the shame of admitting to another human being what you are struggling with. It is also available worldwide without toll charges. It can be done in snippets — you can start any time and resume on your own schedule — including your emotional schedule of what you can handle.

My first and biggest concern is security. CP possession outrages ordinary people, which translates into elected officials and law enforcement vigorously prosecuting those who have it. The nightmare scenario is that those who have a CP-viewing problem will visit the site, comforted by a guarantee of anonymity, law enforcement will keep a careful list, and when they have collected identifying information for hundreds or thousands of people, will then use that information as the basis of investigations — perhaps even probable cause for searches.

Until this issue is adequately addressed, I would have to encourage any and all people to not visit this part of the website — those who have viewed illegal CP and those who have not. If it is adequately addressed, I think this should be an excellent resource.

On the welcome page to this StopItNow program, it says, "We keep NO details or information that can identify the people who access this site." I'm inclined to think they are telling the truth (though I am not certain of it). However, the ways of the internet are complicated and mysterious to most of us. Based on Edward Snowden's revelations, we know government surveillance can be very intrusive. The idea that law enforcement in the service of CP investigations does not have the resources of the US NSA is little comfort, since they may acquire more in the future, or the relevant technology may get cheaper. This information may be collected without StopItNow's knowledge.

StopItNow may understandably be unwilling or unable to give assurances as to what the police will do in secret. However, they do have control over the content of their website, and it has a big problem. The assumption in the text is that anyone looking at this material HAS in fact looked at illegal images of children. They have committed a crime. Visiting this part of the website (or not leaving) can be taken as an admission that you have committed a crime.

The welcome messages include, "Welcome to the section of this website for people who are concerned about their online viewing of sexual images of children." Later, "Perhaps you have already stopped looking at sexual images of children; or perhaps not. Maybe you are under investigation by the police; or possibly nobody knows about your online behaviour."

There is no welcome message for, "Perhaps you aren't sure whether the images you look at are legal or not". There is no message for, "Perhaps you are afraid that your viewing of legal images will lead you to view illegal images". There is no message for, "Perhaps you want to stop looking at images because this activity adversely affects your life — even though they are legal images." There is no message for, "Perhaps you want to see for yourself what the process of dealing with this problem is and what we would recommend based on different people's situations."

Indicating that all of these are reasons to visit this part of the site would go a long way to defusing the idea that anyone working through these exercises is admitting to criminal activity.

I have many other criticisms of the contents of the StopItNow material, but none of them would interfere with my enthusiastically suggesting that people who have a CP-viewing problem use it. Security does.

thepword is a collection of 220 articles, blogs and podcasts in the voices of pedophiles who oppose adult child sexual contact and exploitation. Our content is frequently removed from mainstream social media or blog sites because of what we are and the fact we talk about it. Our side of the conversation continues here.

other relevant content

two audiences: pedophiles and public

fundamental beliefs

libby purves' more lives than one

ethan edwards

My year 2014 posts were addressed primarily to a public that is skeptical of anything good or decent about pedophiles at all.

ethan edwards

what do anti-contact pedophiles believe?

ethan edwards

Reviewing a book that is 19 years old may seem strange. But this is not a blog about current events. If there's something important that's not widely known, I figure it's worth writing about it, even if it is 30 years old or 3,000 years old.

other relevant content

My year 2014 posts were addressed primarily to a public that is skeptical of anything good or decent about pedophiles at all.

what do anti-contact pedophiles believe?

Reviewing a book that is 19 years old may seem strange. But this is not a blog about current events. If there's something important that's not widely known, I figure it's worth writing about it, even if it is 30 years old or 3,000 years old.