|
thread: risk or risk factor?bly rede15 July 2020 |
Does the distinction matter? Yes, so much that it could be the difference between child abuse and no crime.Bly Rede is the co-director of Virtuous Pedophiles. Blog posts reflect his personal views, and are not statements from the organisation.
People think of pedophiles as being "at risk of committing sexual crimes against children" But pedophilia is just a risk *factor* for sexual crime (just as heterosexuality is also a risk factor for committing other kinds of sexual crimes). Not only that but we also know > > that [...] many [...] of those who commit sexual crimes against children are *not* pedophiles (surprising but true). To me this means that sexual abuse prevention programmes shpuld be targeted at pedophiles *with multiple risk factors* AS WELL AS others at risk of offending. > > This is separate from support efforts for those disclosing pedophile attraction only. Those programmes are not predicated on crime prevention but on supporting people impacted by unfair stigma around presumed criminal intent. If policymakers could see > > how these things are, and need to be different then there can be hope of a comprehensive and humane solution for situations like the current Menlo Church scandal and others like it. #MAPsAgainstAbuse
| ||
|
|
|
in which leonard processes his feelings |
|
thread: how does a pedophile not become an abuser? |
|
how do you end up viewing cp, anyway? |
|