Does the distinction matter? Yes, so much that it could be the difference between child abuse and no crime. Bly Rede is a co-director of Virtuous Pedophiles. Blog posts reflect his personal views, and are not statements from the organisation.
People think of pedophiles as being "at risk of committing sexual crimes against children". > that [...] many [...] of those who commit sexual crimes against children are *not* pedophiles (surprising but true). > This is separate from support efforts for those disclosing pedophile attraction only. > how these things are, and need to be different then there can be hope of a comprehensive and humane solution for situations like the current Menlo Church scandal and others like it. #MAPsAgainstAbuse This thread has been edited to remove a factual claim (that more sexual offenders against children are non-pedophilic than are pedophilic). This claim, which has some support in the evidence base, nonetheless depends on a specific taxonomy of non-pedophiles and pedophiles. Other valid taxonomies could show a different picture.
| ||
|
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|