

Surely if we want to campaign, we should come out and deanonymise? It's not so easy.
Thread: Why do anti-contact, never-offended MAPs use anonymous identities online? We've done nothing wrong, so we should be able to come out with our real names, right? > > The answer for me is partly about the effects on myself but as much about the effects on other people. > (2) You have to find somewhere to live where you're hopeful local vigilantes or angry people will bot be able to assault you. (4) Your extended family might include young people who could do without the stress of people knowing their relative is a MAP. (6) In seeking to establish a blameless reputation in a world that doesn't want to hear that from a pedophile, you encourage hundreds of internet warriors to lie about you, and people from your past to consider dealing with their new ambivalence about you > > and their fear of being associated with you by demonising you in public (which is easy to understand). > Some people have been forced out by doxxing, others in the future perhaps will be brave enough to declare themselves MAP under their real life identities. About the author: I have been writing and talking about the experience of being a pedophile since 2017. Once on twitter until my account was banned in 2020, I co-led Virtuous Pedophiles from 2021 to 2025. I now continue to look for ways to improve the lives of pedophiles, but never at the expense of harming children. I have never viewed illegal material, and never sought or engaged in sexual activity with any child. The rest of my life is countryside walking, friends, Radio 3 and feeling doleful about ageing.
| ||
| | ||
| |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
| | ||||
thread: window shoppers and thieves |
| |
the cascade from yuck |
| |
pulling cp apart — the activity |
| |