Surely if we want to campaign, we should come out and deanonymise? It's not so easy.

Bly Rede is a former co-director of Virtuous Pedophiles. Blog posts reflect his personal views, and are not statements from the organisation.

Thread: Why do anti-contact, never-offended MAPs use anonymous identities online? We've done nothing wrong, so we should be able to come out with our real names, right? >

> The answer for me is partly about the effects on myself but as much about the effects on other people.

(1) Certainly, any out pedophile (even if never offending) can expect to lose their job, as employers protect their reputations (which they could probably do with indemnity) >

> (2) You have to find somewhere to live where you're hopeful local vigilantes or angry people will bot be able to assault you.

(3) If you have a partner and an extended family, whether you stay with them or not, you can't be sure your decision won't negatively affect them. >

(4) Your extended family might include young people who could do without the stress of people knowing their relative is a MAP.

(5) You expose everyone you ever knew to a period of wondering what they should have done (either for or against you). >

(6) In seeking to establish a blameless reputation in a world that doesn't want to hear that from a pedophile, you encourage hundreds of internet warriors to lie about you, and people from your past to consider dealing with their new ambivalence about you >

> and their fear of being associated with you by demonising you in public (which is easy to understand).

Against all these downsides, the upside is you no longer live a lie, though you cannot undo any collateral damage from the lie's ending. >

> Some people have been forced out by doxxing, others in the future perhaps will be brave enough to declare themselves MAP under their real life identities.

However, I hope those sceptical of our motivations for anonymity can acknowledge this bind we're in. ||

This content was removed from Twitter in 2020 because the author's account was suspended.

the p word is a collection of 293 articles, blogs, podcasts and threads in the voices of pedophiles and others who oppose adult child sexual contact and sexual exploitation of children. Despite our mainstream views, this content is frequently removed from mainstream social media or blog sites because openly discussing pedophile attractions or avowing them are not tolerated. Our side of the conversation continues here.

editor at the p word net | All images are AI and do not depict real people.

thread: why don't anti-cs talk about the age of consent?

married to a map

the tragedy of child sex dolls and artificial cp

bly

It's taboo to start a discussion about this among anti-contacts. Here's why.

bruce and gina

As soon as she couldn't handle it, I was like, no, I'm done. Uh, this won't work, nice try, I'm gonna pull out, and I left.

brett daywalker

No children have been harmed, and there is no evidence that the people viewing such media have or will harm children, but they have been made criminals anyway.

It's taboo to start a discussion about this among anti-contacts. Here's why.

As soon as she couldn't handle it, I was like, no, I'm done. Uh, this won't work, nice try, I'm gonna pull out, and I left.

No children have been harmed, and there is no evidence that the people viewing such media have or will harm children, but they have been made criminals anyway.