Representation for us is very difficult in film or using our own identities. Could theatre have a solution?

For some of us, it's a big risk to appear in audio using our own voices (which is why though I was desperate to appear on @Preventionintvn's podcast, I had to rely on the voice and generously given time of an advocate.

Other people use voice >

> modification instead but this is (a) potentially vulnerable to reverse engineering and (b) makes our voices sound weird and distorted, like we're not quite human.

The problem: It's really hard for people to recognise our humanity when we have to dehumanise ourselves >

> and I wonder if there could be another way.

Some people are enormously brave, like Todd Nickerson, appearing as himself on camera with @LAHWF
https://youtube.com/watch?v=GOb493ued-g
- but I doubt too many of us are going to follow suit...

There is one other approach, though, >

> (which has been around quite a while) called #verbatimtheatre in which actors read out the words, exactly as spoken, of someone interviewed beforehand. It's used for all kinds of purposes, but one of the most effective is in giving a human physical presence and a voice to >

> people whose voice cannot easily be heard, and who might otherwise be invisible.

This is exactly the situation of most MAPs. There are some of us, maybe, who have offended and thereby lost their employability and safety who perhaps (perhaps!) have less reason to care >

> about the world being able to link their real identity with their MAPness.

But non-offending MAPs have that thing of being able to remain anonymous in the world. It's obviously helpful in some ways to be invisible, but in other ways it's a deep well of loneliness. >

> I am hoping that some verbatim theatre makers with a platform might take a look at our situation, consider whether they can do anything with our voices, and whether there's a human story there that they would consider representing, in whatever way they think is balanced. ::

This content was removed from Twitter in 2020 because the author's account was suspended.

the p word is a collection of 316 articles, blogs, podcasts and threads in the voices of pedophiles and others who oppose adult child sexual contact and sexual exploitation of children. Despite our mainstream views, this content is frequently removed from social media or blog sites because openly discussing pedophile attractions or avowing them are not tolerated. Our side of the conversation continues here.

editor at the p word net | Except where stated, all images are AI and do not depict real people. | Download the whole site.

thread: the narrative of situational offenders

thread: common misconceptions

is pedophilia an orientation or a disorder?

bly

Are sexual offenders against children really divided neatly into 'pedophilic' and 'situational'?

bly

Many people believe many things about us, but most are wrong.

bly

The key question that public and experts are debating to understand the nature of attraction to children.

Are sexual offenders against children really divided neatly into 'pedophilic' and 'situational'?

Many people believe many things about us, but most are wrong.

The key question that public and experts are debating to understand the nature of attraction to children.