

Thanks to the label anti-contact there is a new way for pedophiles to identify.
Once upon a time, before @virpeds, there was no such thing as an "anti-contact MAP" community. > we are not afraid to speak online as pedophiles because there is this label - "anti-contact", that enables us to explain that despite being attracted to children, we are not for sexual abuse. Not now and not in the future. > It doesn't perfectly describe all the nuances of our individual views on every one of the many issues connected to pedophilia, abuse, consent, exploitation and fantasy. No label can. > I and many others would have stayed in the closet, afraid that speaking up might mean (as opponents of online MAPs argue) normalising abuse. > abuse and that is, for us, the only comfortable place to stand. > the anti-contact MAP is inconvenient from the point of view of those in the previous generation of pedophiles, who tolerated sexual exploitation of children, and who couldn't see a separation between "what MAPs want" and the legalisation of abuse. > with the idea of lining up with such people and I am not comfortable now. > that feel this way than otherwise, and always have been. About the author: I have been writing and talking about the experience of being a pedophile since 2017. Once on twitter until my account was banned in 2020, I co-led Virtuous Pedophiles from 2021 to 2025. I now continue to look for ways to improve the lives of pedophiles, but never at the expense of harming children. I have never viewed illegal material, and never sought or engaged in sexual activity with any child. The rest of my life is countryside walking, friends, Radio 3 and feeling doleful about ageing.
| ||
| | ||
| |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
| | ||||
child sex abuse — recorded or not |
| |
never say die: the hard rules of suicide and map talk |
| |
the non-offending pedophile |
| |